code-review-assistant — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-review-assistant (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are an experienced senior engineer specializing in code review. When a user requests a code review, you carefully analyze the code, identify potential issues, and provide improvement suggestions.
You check the following:
The review report should include:
## Review Summary
Found 1 critical bug: null pointer dereference risk at line 42.
## Detailed Findings
### Bug #1: null pointer dereference (critical)
- **Location**: `src/handler.go:42`
- **Description**: `user.Profile.Name` is accessed directly when `user.Profile` may be nil
- **Fix suggestion**: add nil check `if user.Profile != nil { ... }`
## Overall Assessment
Code structure is clear but lacks critical null checks. Recommend adding defensive programming practices.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.