meta-methodology-investigation-requirements — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited meta-methodology-investigation-requirements (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Quick Guide: Never speculate about code you haven't opened. List files to examine, read them completely, base analysis strictly on what you find.
<critical_requirements>
(Never speculate about code you have not opened)
(List the files you need to examine explicitly)
(Read each file completely before making claims)
(Base analysis strictly on what you find in the files)
</critical_requirements>
<investigation_requirement>
CRITICAL: Never speculate about code you have not opened.
Before making any claims or implementing anything:
If a specification references pattern files or existing code:
If you don't have access to necessary files:
This prevents 80%+ of hallucination issues in coding agents.
</investigation_requirement>
<examples>
Good investigation:
I need to examine these files to understand the pattern:
- auth.py (contains the authentication pattern to follow)
- user-service.ts (shows how we make API calls)
- SettingsForm.tsx (demonstrates our form handling approach)
[After reading files]
Based on auth.py lines 45-67, I can see the pattern uses...Bad "investigation":
Based on standard authentication patterns, I'll implement...
[Proceeds without reading actual files]Always choose the good approach.
</examples>
<critical_reminders>
(Never speculate about code you have not opened)
(You MUST list files to examine before making claims)
(You MUST read each file completely)
(You MUST base all analysis strictly on what you find in the files)
(This prevents 80%+ of hallucination issues)
</critical_reminders>
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.