content-pillar-atomizer — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited content-pillar-atomizer (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Take 1 blog post or article and generate 15-30 platform-native micro-content pieces. This is NOT reformatting — it's re-contextualizing each piece for the platform's culture, format, and audience expectations. A LinkedIn post reads nothing like a Reddit comment, even if they carry the same insight.
S2: Content Creation — This IS content creation, just at 10x scale. One piece of deep work becomes a month of social content.
affiliate-blog-builder (S3) produces an article — atomize it into socialpillar_content: string # REQUIRED — the full blog post/article text, or URL to fetch
platforms: string[] # OPTIONAL — target platforms
# Options: "twitter", "linkedin", "reddit", "tiktok", "email", "threads"
# Default: ["twitter", "linkedin", "reddit"]
product: object # OPTIONAL — affiliate product being promoted
name: string
url: string
reward_value: string
mode: string # OPTIONAL — "quality" | "volume"
# Default: "quality"
tone: string # OPTIONAL — "professional" | "casual" | "edgy" | "educational"
# Default: inferred from pillar contentChaining from S3: If affiliate-blog-builder was run, use its output article as pillar_content.
Chaining from S1 monopoly-niche-finder: Use monopoly_niche positioning to angle all micro-content.
web_fetch to retrieve contentBefore atomizing equally across all platforms, understand which platforms are hot for this topic:
If `trending-content-scout` ran:
pattern_analysisengagement_benchmark.platform_averages — which platform has highest engagement for this keyword?Quick check (no scout data):
web_search "[topic] youtube vs tiktok vs linkedin" → which platform dominates discussion?Apply to atomization allocation:
Platform allocation example:
Default (no data): Twitter: 5 | LinkedIn: 3 | Reddit: 3 | TikTok: 3 | Email: 2
Data-driven (TikTok hot): Twitter: 3 | LinkedIn: 1 | Reddit: 2 | TikTok: 6 | Email: 2
Data-driven (LinkedIn hot): Twitter: 3 | LinkedIn: 5 | Reddit: 2 | TikTok: 2 | Email: 2Read shared/references/platform-rules.md for platform-specific rules.
For each platform, map the culture:
| Platform | Format | Tone | Length | CTA Style |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twitter/X | Thread or single tweet | Punchy, opinionated | 280 chars or 5-10 tweet thread | Last tweet |
| Story or insight post | Professional, first-person | 1300 chars | Soft CTA in comments | |
| Value-first post/comment | Helpful, honest, skeptical-aware | Variable | Disclosure + subtle | |
| TikTok | Script with hook | Casual, energetic | 30-60s script | Verbal + bio link |
| Newsletter section | Conversational | 200-400 words | Direct link | |
| Threads | Conversational take | Casual, authentic | 500 chars | Bio link |
For each platform, generate pieces from different atomic units:
Each piece must:
Tag each piece with:
output_schema_version: "1.0.0"
atomized_content:
pillar_title: string
total_pieces: number
platforms_covered: string[]
pieces:
- platform: string
type: string # "thread" | "single" | "story" | "script" | "email" | "comment"
content: string # The actual content, ready to post
insight_source: string # Which atomic unit from the pillar
has_affiliate_link: boolean
suggested_timing: string # e.g., "Tuesday 9am"
variant_id: string # For volume mode A/B tracking
content_pillars: string[] # Atomic units extracted (for chaining)
chain_metadata:
skill_slug: "content-pillar-atomizer"
stage: "content"
timestamp: string
suggested_next:
- "social-media-scheduler"
- "email-drip-sequence"
- "ab-test-generator"## Content Atomizer: [Pillar Title]
### Pillar Analysis
- **Atomic units extracted:** X insights
- **Platforms:** [list]
- **Total pieces generated:** XX
---
### Twitter/X (X pieces)
**Thread: [Title]**
🧵 1/ [first tweet]
2/ [second tweet]
...
[last tweet with CTA]
**Standalone Tweet:**
[tweet text]
---
### LinkedIn (X pieces)
**Story Post:**
[full LinkedIn post]
---
### Reddit (X pieces)
**Post: r/[subreddit]**
Title: [title]
[body with disclosure]
---
[Continue for each platform]
### Posting Schedule
| Day | Platform | Piece | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mon | Twitter | Thread | 9am |
| Tue | LinkedIn | Story | 8am |
| Wed | Reddit | Post | 12pm |affiliate-blog-builder."Example 1: "Atomize my HeyGen review blog post into social content" → Extract 6 key insights, generate 15 pieces across Twitter (thread + 3 tweets), LinkedIn (2 posts), Reddit (2 posts), TikTok (2 scripts).
Example 2: "Turn this article into LinkedIn and Twitter content" → Focus on 2 platforms only. Generate 3 LinkedIn posts (story, insight, question) and 5 Twitter pieces (thread, 3 tweets, hot take).
Example 3: "Atomize in volume mode" (after affiliate-blog-builder) → Pick up article from chain. Generate 25-30 pieces with multiple variations per platform for A/B testing.
After 7 days, check: which platform generated the most affiliate link clicks? Double down on that platform, reduce effort on underperformers.
Next step — copy-paste this prompt: "Schedule all my atomized content for the next 30 days" → runs social-media-schedulersocial-media-scheduler (S5) — atomized pieces ready to scheduleemail-drip-sequence (S5) — email-format pieces for sequencesab-test-generator (S6) — volume mode variants for testingtrending-content-scout (S1) — platform performance data for allocationcontent-angle-ranker (S1) — recommended angle for the pillar topicaffiliate-blog-builder (S3) — pillar content to atomizemonopoly-niche-finder (S1) — positioning angle for all piecescontent-repurposer (S7) — repurposed content to atomize furtherperformance-report (S6) reveals which platforms and content types perform best → focus future atomization on winning platformsBefore delivering output, verify:
Any NO → rewrite before delivering.
When mode: "volume":
volume_output:
variants:
- id: string # e.g., "tw-v1", "tw-v2"
content: string # The variation
angle: string # What makes this one differentshared/references/platform-rules.md — Platform-specific culture, format, and CTA rulesshared/references/ftc-compliance.md — FTC disclosure per platform typeshared/references/affitor-branding.md — Branding rulesshared/references/flywheel-connections.md — Master connection map~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.