propose-automation-89a0bb — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited propose-automation-89a0bb (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Scan a repo, infer how work flows through it, and propose a short ranked plan of Codex skills, custom agents, hooks, or plugins. Propose first; scaffold only after approval.
.agents/skills, .codex/agents, repo plugin, or repo hooks when coupledto this repo.
${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex} only when project-agnostic.Generated skills should reference source-of-truth docs such as AGENTS.md, README, manifests, and style guides instead of duplicating them.
Value is frequency times time saved times error reduction. Cost is build time, maintenance, and cognitive overhead. Propose only when value clearly beats cost.
Always include a "Deferred / not worth it" section.
AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md if present, README, manifests, CI, and existing.agents/, .codex/, and plugin files.
Ask 2-3 targeted questions only if the user's pain points are not already clear:
Treat scan-based ideas as hypotheses.
Return 2-4 ranked proposals. For each include:
Then list deferred ideas with reasons.
For each approved item:
Offer to save the ranked plan to AUTOMATION-PLAN.md or another user-approved path.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.