gap-analysis-framework — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited gap-analysis-framework (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
The Gap Analysis Framework skill provides specialized capabilities for systematic comparison of current and future states, identification of gaps, root cause analysis, and prioritized improvement planning. This skill enables structured analysis that drives actionable improvement roadmaps.
Perform gap analysis between current and future states:
Current State: [Description of current capabilities/processes]
Future State: [Description of desired capabilities/processes]
Identify gaps by capability area and calculate severity.Perform root cause analysis on these gaps:
[List of identified gaps]
Apply 5 Whys technique and create Fishbone diagram structure.Prioritize these gaps using impact/effort analysis:
[Gap list with descriptions]
Generate prioritization matrix and recommended sequence.Create an improvement roadmap to close these gaps:
[Prioritized gap list]
Include phases, milestones, and resource requirements.This skill integrates with the following business analysis processes:
| Severity Level | Score | Description | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | 5 | Prevents business operation | Immediate action |
| High | 4 | Significant business impact | Priority resolution |
| Medium | 3 | Moderate business impact | Planned resolution |
| Low | 2 | Minor business impact | Scheduled resolution |
| Minimal | 1 | Negligible impact | Monitor only |
| Quadrant | Impact | Effort | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick Wins | High | Low | Do first |
| Major Projects | High | High | Plan carefully |
| Fill-ins | Low | Low | Do if time permits |
| Thankless Tasks | Low | High | Avoid or defer |
Gap: [Statement of gap]
Why 1: [First level cause]
Why 2: [Second level cause]
Why 3: [Third level cause]
Why 4: [Fourth level cause]
Why 5: [Root cause]| Level | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial | Ad-hoc, unpredictable |
| 2 | Managed | Reactive, project-level |
| 3 | Defined | Proactive, organizational |
| 4 | Quantitatively Managed | Measured, controlled |
| 5 | Optimizing | Continuous improvement |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.