chain-forensics — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited chain-forensics (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Expert on-chain analysis and transaction forensics for security investigations and incident response.
| Tool | Purpose | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Phalcon MCP | Transaction analysis, exploit detection | phalcon-mcp |
| whale-tracker-mcp | Large transaction monitoring | whale-tracker |
| bicscan-mcp | Address risk scoring | bicscan |
| dune-analytics-mcp | Custom queries, analytics | dune |
| Etherscan MCP | Block explorer data | etherscan |
# Get transaction details
cast tx 0xTxHash --rpc-url $RPC
# Decode transaction input
cast 4byte-decode $(cast tx 0xTxHash --rpc-url $RPC | grep input)
# Get internal transactions via Etherscan API
curl "https://api.etherscan.io/api?module=account&action=txlistinternal&txhash=0xTxHash&apikey=$KEY"// Phalcon trace analysis
const trace = await phalcon.analyzeTransaction(txHash);
// Identify key flows
const flows = {
valueTransfers: trace.transfers.filter(t => t.value > 0),
tokenTransfers: trace.erc20Transfers,
internalCalls: trace.calls.filter(c => c.type === 'CALL'),
delegateCalls: trace.calls.filter(c => c.type === 'DELEGATECALL')
};const addressProfile = {
address: '0x...',
// Basic metrics
metrics: {
firstTransaction: '2022-01-15',
transactionCount: 1234,
uniqueInteractions: 56,
totalValueTransferred: '1000 ETH'
},
// Activity patterns
patterns: {
activeHours: [14, 15, 16], // UTC hours
frequentProtocols: ['Uniswap', 'Aave'],
averageTxFrequency: '5/day'
},
// Risk indicators
riskFlags: {
tornadoCashInteraction: false,
sanctionedAddressInteraction: false,
knownExploitPattern: false,
highFrequencyTrading: true
},
// Related addresses
clusters: [
{ address: '0x...', confidence: 0.95, reason: 'Funding source' },
{ address: '0x...', confidence: 0.8, reason: 'Common recipient' }
]
};-- Dune Analytics query for sandwich detection
WITH potential_sandwiches AS (
SELECT
block_number,
transaction_index,
"from",
"to",
value,
LAG("from") OVER (PARTITION BY block_number ORDER BY transaction_index) as prev_from,
LEAD("from") OVER (PARTITION BY block_number ORDER BY transaction_index) as next_from
FROM ethereum.transactions
WHERE block_number > {{start_block}}
)
SELECT *
FROM potential_sandwiches
WHERE prev_from = next_from
AND prev_from != "from"
-- Additional filters for DEX interactions// Analyze flashbots bundles
const bundleAnalysis = {
bundleHash: '0x...',
transactions: [
{ index: 0, type: 'frontrun', profit: '0.5 ETH' },
{ index: 1, type: 'victim', loss: '0.3 ETH' },
{ index: 2, type: 'backrun', profit: '0.4 ETH' }
],
totalMEV: '0.9 ETH',
miner: '0x...',
minerPayment: '0.45 ETH'
};const rugpullIndicators = {
// Contract analysis
contract: {
hasHiddenMint: true, // Owner can mint unlimited
hasDisableTrading: true, // Can disable selling
hasBlacklist: true, // Can block addresses
highOwnershipConcentration: true, // >50% in few wallets
unverifiedContract: true,
recentDeployment: true // <7 days old
},
// Token metrics
tokenMetrics: {
liquidityLocked: false,
lockDuration: 0,
holderCount: 50,
top10HoldersPercent: 85
},
// Trading patterns
tradingPatterns: {
artificialVolume: true, // Wash trading detected
sellPressure: 'high',
buyWallsArtificial: true
},
riskScore: 95 // 0-100
};-- Identify circular trading
WITH transfers AS (
SELECT
"from",
"to",
contract_address,
value,
block_time
FROM erc20_ethereum.evt_Transfer
WHERE contract_address = {{token_address}}
AND block_time > NOW() - INTERVAL '7 days'
)
SELECT
a."from" as trader,
COUNT(DISTINCT b."to") as counterparties,
SUM(a.value) as total_volume,
COUNT(*) as trade_count
FROM transfers a
JOIN transfers b ON a."to" = b."from" AND a."from" = b."to"
WHERE a.block_time < b.block_time
AND b.block_time < a.block_time + INTERVAL '1 hour'
GROUP BY a."from"
HAVING COUNT(*) > 10
ORDER BY total_volume DESCconst crossChainTrace = {
originChain: 'ethereum',
originTx: '0x...',
originAddress: '0x...',
bridge: 'Wormhole',
bridgeMessage: '0x...',
destinationChain: 'arbitrum',
destinationTx: '0x...',
destinationAddress: '0x...',
amount: '100 USDC',
timestamp: {
origin: '2024-01-15T10:00:00Z',
destination: '2024-01-15T10:15:00Z'
}
};// Track address across chains
const multiChainProfile = {
primaryAddress: '0x...',
chainPresence: {
ethereum: { address: '0x...', balance: '10 ETH', txCount: 500 },
arbitrum: { address: '0x...', balance: '5 ETH', txCount: 200 },
optimism: { address: '0x...', balance: '3 ETH', txCount: 100 },
polygon: { address: '0x...', balance: '1000 MATIC', txCount: 50 }
},
bridgeHistory: [
{ from: 'ethereum', to: 'arbitrum', amount: '5 ETH', date: '2024-01-10' },
{ from: 'ethereum', to: 'optimism', amount: '3 ETH', date: '2024-01-12' }
]
};# Blockchain Forensic Investigation Report
## Executive Summary
- **Investigation ID**: INV-2024-XXX
- **Date Range**: 2024-01-01 to 2024-01-15
- **Subject**: [Address/Protocol/Incident]
- **Conclusion**: [Brief finding]
## Key Findings
### 1. Fund Flow Analysis
[Diagram and description of fund movements]
### 2. Address Attribution
| Address | Attribution | Confidence | Evidence |
|---------|-------------|------------|----------|
| 0x... | Attacker | High | Funding pattern |
| 0x... | Mixer | Medium | Tornado Cash |
| 0x... | Exchange | High | Known deposit |
### 3. Timeline
| Timestamp | Event | Addresses | Amount |
|-----------|-------|-----------|--------|
| T+0 | Initial exploit | 0x... | 1000 ETH |
| T+1h | Consolidation | 0x... | 1000 ETH |
| T+2h | Mixer deposit | Tornado | 100 ETH |
### 4. Attack Vector
[Technical description of how the incident occurred]
### 5. Total Impact
- Funds Lost: $X
- Users Affected: Y
- Contracts Exploited: Z
## Appendix
- Full transaction list
- Address clustering data
- Supporting evidenceThis skill integrates with:
incident-response-exploits.js - Exploit investigationeconomic-simulation.js - Market impact analysissmart-contract-security-audit.js - Post-audit monitoring| Tool | Purpose | URL |
|---|---|---|
| Etherscan | Explorer, API | etherscan.io |
| Dune Analytics | Custom queries | dune.com |
| Nansen | Wallet labels, flows | nansen.ai |
| Arkham Intelligence | Entity attribution | arkhamintelligence.com |
| Chainalysis Reactor | Investigation platform | chainalysis.com |
| TRM Labs | Risk scoring | trmlabs.com |
| Phalcon | Tx analysis | phalcon.blocksec.com |
agents/incident-response/AGENT.md - Incident commander agentskills/bug-bounty/SKILL.md - Disclosure coordinationincident-response-exploits.js - Full incident process~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.