adversarial-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited adversarial-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Independent adversarial code review checking spec compliance. Uses binary PASS/FAIL verdicts (not subjective feedback) with required file:line evidence citations.
| Aspect | Collaborative | Adversarial |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Help improve code | Verify spec compliance |
| Verdict | Suggestions | Binary PASS/FAIL |
| Evidence | Optional | Required (file:line) |
| Reviewer | Can be reused | Must be fresh |
| Context | Shared | Independent |
On re-review after FAIL, a NEW reviewer instance spawns with no memory of the previous review. This prevents anchoring bias where a reviewer fixates on previously identified issues.
Invoke as part of: methodologies/metaswarm/metaswarm-execution-loop (Phase 3)
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.