name: titan-thread-turn-binding
scope: project
status: scaffold
summary: Bind Titan bridge events, approvals, and replay state to explicit thread and turn ids for inspectable continuity.
invocation_mode: explicit-only
technique_dependencies:
- AOA-T-0062
- AOA-T-0066
- AOA-T-0045
titan-thread-turn-binding
Intent
Use this skill to attach Titan bridge events and approvals to a specific thread and turn boundary.
Trigger boundary
Use this skill when:
- events need a thread-turn identity
- approval or digest state must be scoped to one turn
- replay needs stable continuity keys
Do not use this skill when:
- thread or turn identifiers are missing
- the binding would collapse multiple sessions into one record
- binding would grant execution authority by itself
- thread id
- turn id
- event ids or payloads
- receipt ref
- bridge or console state path
Outputs
- thread-turn binding record
- scoped event list
- approval refs
- replay key
- continuity warning
Procedure
- identify the thread id, turn id, receipt refs, and event refs being connected
- bind approvals and replay state to explicit turn boundaries
- flag missing, duplicate, or out-of-order thread and turn evidence
- keep derived continuity state subordinate to bridge and receipt sources
- return the binding packet and the next inspection or repair path
Contracts
- The skill is explicit-only and must not be invoked as hidden background behavior.
- Titan role, helper/control-plane, runtime implementation, memory, proof, and public-runbook authority stays in owner repositories: aoa-agents, aoa-sdk, abyss-stack, aoa-memo, aoa-evals, and 8Dionysus.
- Receipts, bridge ledgers, console state, replay artifacts, approval records, and memory records are witnesses or candidates, not final owner truth.
- Forge mutation and Delta judgment gates must remain distinct, operator-visible, and receipt-linked.
- Missing source refs, missing approval, missing validation, or unclear owner route must be named as stop conditions.
Risks and anti-patterns
- treating Titan vocabulary as permission to widen authority
- letting receipt, replay, console, or bridge state replace owner-repo evidence
- auto-approving Forge or Delta because a plan looks plausible
- promoting candidate memory, approvals, replay, or receipts into canon without owner review
- using the skill for an ordinary repo task that has no explicit Titan route
Verification
- confirm direct skill invocation or explicit Titan service-cohort request is present
- confirm lane, gate, source refs, and owner surface are named when relevant
- confirm Forge or Delta locked or allowed state matches recorded approval evidence
- confirm generated artifacts are marked witness, candidate, derived, or advisory rather than final truth
- confirm next validation, replay, repair, or owner-route follow-up is named before continuation
Technique traceability
Manifest-backed techniques:
- AOA-T-0062 from
8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at fe4b04ed877916c46e60e70aaa9a1d4c86e81b6e using path techniques/continuity/handoff-continuation/episode-bounded-agent-loop/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Intent, Inputs, Outputs, Core procedure, Contracts, Risks, Validation - AOA-T-0066 from
8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at 3b1d5d623569aa4920b87280d0db0e911d2e29d5 using path techniques/history/history-artifacts/transcript-replay-artifact/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Intent, Inputs, Outputs, Core procedure, Contracts, Risks, Validation - AOA-T-0045 from
8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at 3b1d5d623569aa4920b87280d0db0e911d2e29d5 using path techniques/history/history-artifacts/witness-trace-as-reviewable-artifact/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Intent, Inputs, Outputs, Core procedure, Contracts, Risks, Validation
Adaptation points
- Extract a Titan-specific reusable technique into aoa-techniques only after repeated reviewed evidence exists; do not add pending IDs as placeholders.
- Keep repo-local command examples in owner docs or examples rather than hard-coding them into skill law.
- If a Titan surface graduates from scaffold to reviewed or evaluated, add review evidence before changing status.