titan-approval-loom

Intent

Use this skill to inspect, add, or resolve approval-queue items for the Titan app-server bridge.

Trigger boundary

Use this skill when:

• a bridge turn contains pending approvals
• operator intent must be matched to a queued action
• approval state must be replayable from ledger events

Do not use this skill when:

• an action should be auto-approved
• approval would bypass Forge or Delta gates
• the queue item has no receipt or thread-turn context

Inputs

• bridge state path
• thread id and turn id
• approval request id
• operator decision
• receipt or event refs

Outputs

• updated approval queue entry
• decision event candidate
• gate status summary
• blocked-action note when approval is insufficient

Procedure

1. load the current bridge approval queue and receipt refs
2. separate pending, allowed, blocked, and expired approval entries
3. bind each approval to Forge or Delta without merging the gates
4. preserve replayable evidence for operator intent and queue state changes
5. return the next visible queue action without starting hidden execution

Contracts

• The skill is explicit-only and must not be invoked as hidden background behavior.
• Titan role, helper/control-plane, runtime implementation, memory, proof, and public-runbook authority stays in owner repositories: aoa-agents, aoa-sdk, abyss-stack, aoa-memo, aoa-evals, and 8Dionysus.
• Receipts, bridge ledgers, console state, replay artifacts, approval records, and memory records are witnesses or candidates, not final owner truth.
• Forge mutation and Delta judgment gates must remain distinct, operator-visible, and receipt-linked.
• Missing source refs, missing approval, missing validation, or unclear owner route must be named as stop conditions.

Risks and anti-patterns

• treating Titan vocabulary as permission to widen authority
• letting receipt, replay, console, or bridge state replace owner-repo evidence
• auto-approving Forge or Delta because a plan looks plausible
• promoting candidate memory, approvals, replay, or receipts into canon without owner review
• using the skill for an ordinary repo task that has no explicit Titan route

Verification

• confirm direct skill invocation or explicit Titan service-cohort request is present
• confirm lane, gate, source refs, and owner surface are named when relevant
• confirm Forge or Delta locked or allowed state matches recorded approval evidence
• confirm generated artifacts are marked witness, candidate, derived, or advisory rather than final truth
• confirm next validation, replay, repair, or owner-route follow-up is named before continuation

Technique traceability

Manifest-backed techniques:

• AOA-T-0028 from 8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at 3b1d5d623569aa4920b87280d0db0e911d2e29d5 using path techniques/execution/agent-workflows-core/confirmation-gated-mutating-action/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Intent, When to use, Inputs, Outputs, Core procedure, Contracts, Validation
• AOA-T-0045 from 8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at 3b1d5d623569aa4920b87280d0db0e911d2e29d5 using path techniques/history/history-artifacts/witness-trace-as-reviewable-artifact/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Intent, Inputs, Outputs, Core procedure, Contracts, Risks, Validation
• AOA-T-0062 from 8Dionysus/aoa-techniques at fe4b04ed877916c46e60e70aaa9a1d4c86e81b6e using path techniques/continuity/handoff-continuation/episode-bounded-agent-loop/TECHNIQUE.md and sections: Intent, Inputs, Outputs, Core procedure, Contracts, Risks, Validation

Adaptation points

• Extract a Titan-specific reusable technique into aoa-techniques only after repeated reviewed evidence exists; do not add pending IDs as placeholders.
• Keep repo-local command examples in owner docs or examples rather than hard-coding them into skill law.
• If a Titan surface graduates from scaffold to reviewed or evaluated, add review evidence before changing status.